Search for: "Gibson v. No Named Defendants" Results 1 - 20 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2015, 1:52 pm
Emeline, with the assistance of a founder of the Houston Bar Association named Peter Gray, defended her freedom against a man named Jesse Bolls, who attempted to claim ownership of her. [read post]
28 May 2008, 7:27 am
Here, the government got a wiretap on the defendant under one name. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm by Ron Coleman
One of the first posts on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® was about Gibson Guitar Corp. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm by Bona Law PC
You might expect to see named plaintiffs for a class of allegedly injured parties suing defendants (and it is usually multiple defendants) under the federal antitrust laws for damages. [read post]
One particularly noteworthy development is that not a single securities class action filing thus far in 2012 has named an accounting firm as a defendant, possibly as a result of the Supreme Court's rejection of aiding and abetting liability under the securities laws, emphatically reinforced last year in Janus Capital Group Inc. v. [read post]
One particularly noteworthy development is that not a single securities class action filing thus far in 2012 has named an accounting firm as a defendant, possibly as a result of the Supreme Court's rejection of aiding and abetting liability under the securities laws, emphatically reinforced last year in Janus Capital Group Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 1:48 pm by Steve Statsinger
The defendant relied on United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 9:21 am by Nassiri Law
In Betts .v McDonald’s Corp., a large restaurant chain was named as a defendant by 10 Hispanic and African American men who allege their termination by a franchisee of three Virginia-based restaurants amounts to racial discrimination. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
  One particularly noteworthy development is that not a single securities class action filing thus far in 2012 has named an accounting firm as a defendant, possibly as a result of the Supreme Court’s rejection of aiding and abetting liability under the securities laws, emphatically reinforced last year in Janus Capital Group Inc. v. [read post]